home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1123 / 1123p039.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  70KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: Florida judgment, and could also require Izumi to further drain 1t resources support Sears defense Philips' revived trade dress claim 11 Illinois. 11 Respondents may argue that 11 would be unfair sad dle litigants who settle with the preclusive Pue preceden- tial effects of an unreviewed judgment. However where an appellant causes the dismissal of its oWn appeal. it is no position tO complain that [its] right ot review has been lost Moreover, when party foregoes or dismisses Its appeal without settlement, clear that res judicata and collat 11 izumi's sales contract: with 5cars require Izurmi to holdi harmles. liabilities, and losses, indemnify costs and Sears expenses from and arising against out all claims anv actual actions, allieged infringement of AUE patent, tradenarl or copyright by ...